QB fantasy projections are a coin flip — a well-made one
Here is the most surprising thing our data says about quarterbacks: the projections are not too high and not too low. Across 806 weeks where a QB was projected 15+ full-PPR points, he beat the number 49.9% of the time and the median miss was exactly 0.0. As a midpoint, a QB projection is about as honest as a number can be.
The catch is everything around the midpoint.
| Projected | Weeks | Beat proj. | Within ±3 | Lost 5+ | Gained 10+ | Median | Typical range (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3–9 pts | 18 | 28% | 67% | 11% | 0% | -2.3 | -5.4 to +0.9 |
| 9–15 pts | 270 | 50% | 35% | 23% | 8% | +0.1 | -9.2 to +8.7 |
| 15+ pts | 806 | 50% | 29% | 26% | 11% | +0.0 | -9.2 to +10.4 |
The math of a "20-point" quarterback
Take a QB projected at 20.0. The middle 80% of comparable weeks landed between the 10th and 90th percentile of misses — that is, between 20 − 9.2 = 10.8 and 20 + 10.4 = 30.4. One week in four (26%), he finishes 5+ points under his number. One week in nine (11%), he beats it by 10 or more. The projection told you the middle of the road, not the width of it — and at quarterback the road is about twenty points wide.
Why 1-point ranking gaps are noise
Only 29% of elite-projected QB weeks land within ±3 points of the projection. The weekly standard deviation is about 7.7 points. When two QBs are projected 19.5 and 21.0, the 1.5-point gap is roughly one fifth of one standard deviation — the "wrong" QB outscores the "right" one constantly, and that is not the ranking being bad, it is the position being wide.
The bust rate is a schedule, not a scandal
A quarter of high-end QB weeks come in 5+ points under projection. Over a 14-week fantasy season, that is three or four ugly weeks from a QB doing exactly what the data says a good QB does. The mistake is reacting to week 3 of 14 as if the distribution owed you its median every Sunday.
Sunday Sidekick